From: TILAK CHANDRA <0000058f112ac338-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Glove Box Injury
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:57:05 +0000
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Message-ID: CH2PR06MB661447942974B3ABFEB8D47B88BB9**At_Symbol_Here**

Any extended segment of repetitive work like that can be problematic. I believe there is a need to emphasize problems with arm length, hand size, and box height. I will be concern about very tall people more; they have to premonition down. The chemistry done in the air (outside a Glove Box) can be useful for the industry and large-scale production.


I will suggest generating an ergonomic checklist and guidelines for gloveboxes that would be beneficial for the prevention and reduction of musculoskeletal disorders. I will also suggest approaching the American Glove Box Society for further information. They have one section devoted to Glove Box ergonomics. There is also a nice article in the JCHAS, which talks about Glove Box ergonomic hazards. 


The student can also try yoga to relax neck and shoulder muscles. 





From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU> on behalf of Debra M Decker <00001204b93f9a5e-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 5:11 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Glove Box Injury

Hi All:


I heard from a colleague the other day about a repetitive motion injury she has sustained, working in a glove box for extended periods of time - 9-10 hours in some cases, multiple times a week.  Her PI, while he has high expectations, is supportive and empathetic to her.


Physical therapy has helped but that doesn't solve the root cause: this glove box and most glove boxes are designed for the standard male - 5'10"-6' tall with the attendant shoulder distance to be able to access the glove ports.  She's a very short woman with the attendant smaller distance across her shoulders.  Injury was inevitable.


There are a couple of issues here:


  1. She's a graduate student and currently covered under student health insurance and not workers comp.  This injury could result in life-altering health effects with no long term remedy.  Once again, graduate students are excluded from the protections of workers comp.
  2. Equipment designers ignore the fact that some 50% of the scientific work force are women.  Bespoke design isn't possible.  What's wrong with designing flexibility or adjustability into scientific equipment - particularly the big tickets?


I know I'm railing at the universe here but it's just more examples of how women scientists (and small men, for that matter) are generally ignored and how graduate students, doing the heavy lifting of discovery research, continue to be exploited to the point of injury.


Thanks for listening.




Debbie M. Decker, ACS Fellow

Programming Co-Chair

Chemistry Dept. Safety Manager (ret.)






--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here** Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.