About This Archive  | DCHAS-L 2021 Index   | DCHAS-L Yearly Index
person wearing a disposable face shield and surgical style mask

Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.

Previous by Date:
Subject: [DCHAS-L] OSHA issues emergency temporary standard to protect workers from coronavirus
Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 9:38:49 AM
Author: CHAS membership <membership**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG> 		Next by Date:
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] OSHA issues emergency temporary standard to protect workers from coronavirus
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 07:53:39 -0700
Author: Neal Langerman

From: Info <info**At_Symbol_Here**ilpi.com>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] OSHA issues emergency temporary standard to protect workers from coronavirus
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:17:26 -0400
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Message-ID: 495E3FD9-889F-4292-B4FC-7EDC7EE05167**At_Symbol_Here**ilpi.com
In-Reply-To <3DE0FC74-68D9-425B-8774-25F6C393B990**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org>


Insurance carriers and attorneys will take up any slack, no doubt.

It will be interesting to see if anyone ultimate pursues class actions based on the OHSA General Duty Clause, particularly from early in the pandemic in places like meat processing facilities.  See, for example, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-19-meat-workers-59k/  I would expect that any defendant would try to argue that not enough was known at the time to take proper measures, but that the discovery process will ultimately show otherwise.

Here's an OSHA Standard Interpretation from 2003 titled "Elements necessary for a violation of the General Duty Clause" https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2003-12-18-1 

Employers can be cited for violation of the General Duty Clause if a recognized serious hazard exists in their workplace and the employer does not take reasonable steps to prevent or abate the hazard. The General Duty Clause is used only where there is no standard that applies to the particular hazard. The following elements are necessary to prove a violation of the General Duty Clause:

  1. The employer failed to keep the workplace free of a hazard to which employees of that employer were exposed;
  2. The hazard was recognized;
  3. The hazard was causing or was likely to cause death or serious physical harm; and
  4. There was a feasible and useful method to correct the hazard.

Slam dunk case in my mind.

Rob Toreki


NEW! US-Made, FDA/NIOSH surgical grade N95 https://www.safetyemporium.com/11191
NIOSH-approved N99 and N95 for $1 or less: https://www.safetyemporium.com/covid/

Safety Emporium - Laboratory and Safety Supplies 
https://www.SafetyEmporium.com
esales**At_Symbol_Here**safetyemporium.com  or toll-free: (866) 326-5412
Fax: (856) 553-6154, PO Box 1003, Blackwood, NJ 08012


On Nov 4, 2021, at 9:38 AM, CHAS membership <membership**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG> wrote:

I wonder if OSHA has an enforcement strategy for this that reflects its resource levels?

- Ralph

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDOL/bulletins/2fab063
News Release from OSHA

U.S. Department of Labor  |  November 4, 2021

US Department of Labor issues emergency temporary standard to protect workers from coronavirus
Increases protections for 84M private sector workers

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post


The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.