Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2004 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2004 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: Level of Fume Hood Use at Academic Institutions

Date: Sep 12, 2004 10:00 UTC

Author: Qureshi, Rasim M. <Rasimqureshi**At_Symbol_Here**UNITED.SABIC.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: Impervious Gloves

Date: Sep 13, 2004 01:03 UTC

Author: Jim Kaufman <Labsafe**At_Symbol_Here**AOL.COM>

Subject context

From: Jay Young <chemcon**At_Symbol_Here**JUNO.COM>

Subject: Re: the MSDS discussion

Date: Sep 12, 2004 20:11 UTC

Reply-To: chemcon**At_Symbol_Here**JUNO.COM

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
I guess I'd better get into this and try to be helpful.

there are ways to determine whether or not an MSDS is probably either
defective or reliable: Look for internal contradictions and for
meaningless statements.  As one example, "non-volatile" assertion in one
place and a statement elsewhere that the vapor pressure at ordinary
temperatures is, say, "100 mm."  As another,  "Use with impervious
gloves." with no further clarification.

Several other examples of internal contradictions and meaningless
statements can be found in Chapter 2 of my book, Improving Safety in the
Chemical Laboratory; A Practical Guide, Wiley Interscience, 2nd edition,
1991.  (Excuse the plug.)

Or for the hazards of a chemical in plain English, see the "CLIPs"
published each month in the Journal of Chemical Education

Jay Young

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post