Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2020 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2020 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] [EXTERNAL] [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (9 articles)

Date: Jul 24, 2020 17:27 UTC

Author: Snyder, Brenda K <Brenda.Snyder**At_Symbol_Here**UTOLEDO.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] LAST Chance - CHAS Workshop early registration ends Friday 7-25- 2020

Date: Jul 24, 2020 18:52 UTC

Author: Mary Beth Koza <mbkoza2**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>

Thread context

From: NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Diversity in Chemical Health and Safety

Date: Jul 24, 2020 18:28 UTC

Reply-To: neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] Diversity in Chemical Health and Safety

Demystify: 

All -

I am encouraged by the growing discussion on diversity within the chemical EH&S profession.

 

As you all know, ACS has taken a very strong position to improve diversity within ACS Publications (See Confronting Racism in Chemistry Journals Cynthia J. Burrows, Julia Laskin, et al. doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00383). The Society has also worked hard to address diversity with its staff.

 

CHAS leadership is very diverse by gender. But, the Executive Committee has virtually no diversity by any other measure. Further, the EH&S profession is by and large not diverse. The profession is very under-represented among the several diversity measures.

 

Here are data taken from the June 2020 CHAS Demographics report which illustrate this point.

 

GENDER

 

 

 

Group

 

COUNT

%

Female

 

679

34.95

Male

 

901

46.37

Non-binary/third gender

 

2

0.1

Prefer to self-describe

 

1

0.05

n/a

 

360

18.53

Total

 

1943

100

 

 

 

 

ETHNICITY

 

 

 

African Descent or Black

 

34

1.73

Asian (Including Pacific Islanders)

 

77

3.91

Native American (including Alaskan Native

 

16

0.81

White (Caucasian)

 

709

35.99

Other

 

39

1.98

No Response

 

7

0.36

N/A

 

1088

55.23

Total

 

1970

100

 

 

 

 

HISPANIC

 

 

 

No

 

566

29.13

Yes

 

61

3.14

No Response

 

26

1.34

N/A

 

1290

66.39

Total

 

1943

100

 

I recognize that many of us dislike providing gender/ethnicity/race information. However, we all recognize that you must be able to measure something to improve it. So, a very helpful (and easy) step is to go to your ACS profile and add the missing information. A goal is to reduce the No Response/Not Applicable to less than 10% of each category. Do it today and we can see what the data look like by the end of September.

 

The current discussion is useful with the goal of bringing more ethnic and racial diversity into both leadership and the profession.

It is easy to join the CHAS leadership; you make your interest known to the current Chair or Membership Chair and they will help you develop within the profession and the ACS. A goal is to have a visibly diverse group at the next face-to-face CHAS open meeting, whenever and wherever that happens.

 

I hope we can work together to meet ACS goals and improve our profession.

 

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post