Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2024 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2024 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Gist of the List--ACS Chemical Health & Safety

Date: Aug 31, 2024 13:13 UTC

Author: Mary Beth Mulcahy <mulcahy.marybeth**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Gist of the List--ACS Chemical Health & Safety

Date: Sep 3, 2024 16:24 UTC

Author: Info <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>

From: Info <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>

Subject: [DCHAS-L] DEHP risk. Was: [DCHAS-L] Yes Yeand Another Question.

Date: Sep 3, 2024 16:13 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>

Message-ID: <E60ABAC2-2DE5-4FD6-96C8-E793884873B6**At_Symbol_Here**ilpi.com>

In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR19MB6838CF6797C945E4EF4EA4BFCB952**At_Symbol_Here**SJ0PR19MB6838.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>

Demystify: 
That’s a common plasticizer found in all kinds of products which, like many commonly used phthalates, is an endocrine disruptor; see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842715/
See https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/di2-ethylhexylphthalate-dehp for some examples of common usage in commerce.

Prop 65 is well-intentioned, as a warning of this nature should cause the manufacturer and potential purchasers of the products to think about implementing alternatives that do not contain known carcinogens and fetotoxins.  And there have been several notable victories in that vein.  In practice, it’s a nightmare of blanket CYA overwarnings and disclaimers that provide no context and numb people to the goal of the labelling. For example, we have vendors who put the warning on polystyrene signs and finished products because styrene is on the list.

While it’s always good to limit one’s exposure to chemicals of this nature, if one is being pragmatic, I’d have to say a minimal added exposure from a *potential* one time use (or being in the same room as the kit) in a lifetime of ubiquitous exposure from other sources presents a de minimus added risk.  Personally, I’d have no issues with it, but if I had spare time, I might dash an email off to the manufacturer suggesting they find an alternative.

Rob Toreki


LabLocks™ - The first device that can lock out standard laboratory ball valves: https://www.safetyemporium.com/07400

Safety Emporium - Laboratory and Safety Supplies 
https://www.SafetyEmporium.com
esales**At_Symbol_Here**safetyemporium.com  or toll-free: (866) 326-5412
Fax: (856) 553-6154, PO Box 1003, Blackwood, NJ 08012
GD_logotag_CMYK-trading-partner.jpg



On Aug 28, 2024, at 6:49 PM, Murphy, Dr. Ruth Ann <000019862d8e7db2-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> wrote:

Hello, All,
 
Yes, we are all hopeful Monona and Jack are already much better!
 
My question concerns the safety of lab first aid kits with the following statement. WARNING:  This product can expose you to chemicals including Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, which are known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.  For more information go to etc. (State of California P65 warnings).
 
Thank you in advance.
 
Ruth Ann Cook Murphy, Ph.D.
Professor of Chemistry
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
900 College Street
Belton, TX  76513-2599
Phone 254.295.4542
Accepting Christ is life's greatest decision; following Christ is life's greatest adventure.
 
image001.png
 
                         
 

Attachments

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post