Sep 20, 2013 - Labels on ampoules 5mL or smallerSep 20, 2013 - Labels on ampoules 5mL or smaller
The Home page of ILPI's Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Resource, the leader in SDS information since 1995!
The history and philosophy behind this resource.
A curated collection of books and reference materials concerning Safety Data Sheets and closely related topics.
Paste your plain text SDS into the SDS-Demystifier, and it will be converted into a hypertext-enriched document with links to detailed explanations of each key term.
An extensive list of frequently asked questions about Safety Data Sheets including regulations, content, compliance, and more.
A humorous take on Safety Data Sheet jargon. Fill in the blanks on our entry form to generate a personalized Unsafety Data Sheet to share with your coworkers.
Since 1995, we've maintained this massive curated list of the best places to find Safety Data Sheets on the Internet.
Way more than a glossary, this hypertext-enhanced resource covers hundreds of SDS-related terms and expert knowledge. Each entry includes both the SDS relevance and links to additional authoritative resources.
Archived results of Safety Data Sheet related polls taken by some of our millions of site visitors
You are here! The OSHA regulations behind SDS regulations, including the inspection guidelines and over 400 official interpretations letters under the Hazard Communication Standard
Commercial suppliers of SDS authoring and management software as well as cloud compliance services.
Commercial companies that will create SDS's for your specific needs as well as SDS translation companies.
Safety signs, banners, and scoreboards? Get yours at Safety Emporium!
OSHA Hazard Communication Letters of Interpretation
ILPI assessment: Historical accommodation; current small-container rule applies
Under the current HCS, small-container labeling provisions permit reduced immediate-container labeling for containers of 100 mL or less when full labels, fold-back labels, pull-out labels or tags are not feasible. A separate, narrower provision applies to containers of 3 mL or less when any label interferes with normal use; the product identifier is still required. The immediate outer package must carry the full label and storage instructions. The old accommodation is not the complete current rule, and a website or SDS reference alone does not replace these requirements.
The requirements for legible labels and non-conflicting information remain useful. The 2015 implementation deadlines are historical. This letter does not mean that foreign labeling exceptions, a numbering key, or an SDS website can substitute for applicable U.S. requirements.
This comparison with current requirements is not a finding that OSHA has formally withdrawn this letter. This assessment reflects editorial judgment informed by human review and AI assistance. It is an opinion, may contain errors or omissions, and is not an official OSHA determination. For guidance on how OSHA requirements apply to your circumstances, contact your local OSHA office.
OSHA's notice about interpretation letters
The following notice is published on OSHA's interpretation pages; it is general guidance, not a letter-specific withdrawal notice.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
Background:The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP), a distributor, provides reference standards for various purposes. The standards are usually sold in small containers (5 milliliter (mL) vials, 2 or 5 mL ampules). USP has more than 3,000 chemicals available for sale as reference standards vials. Due to the small size of the containers, fitting all label elements on the label [ILPI:Original HCS 2012 context · Current HCS] requires using a very small font size, which renders the hazard information illegible. Additionally, USP believes it will be cost prohibitive to comply with the new labeling requirements through the use of pull-out labels, fold-back labels, tags or other methods.
Question:USP would like to include only the signal word, hazard statement(s), and pictogram(s) on the label so that the label is easier to read. USP would also include an instruction to refer to the safety data sheet (SDS) prior to use, and provide USP's website address where the SDS can be accessed. Is this acceptable to OSHA?
Chemical users must be able to read labels without the use of any device, with the exception of corrective lenses for the employees whose vision requires corrective lenses. Some of the example labels that you provided are illegible due to the small font size and therefore do not meet the requirements of the HCS [ILPI:Original HCS 2012 context · Current HCS]. Tags, pull-out labels, or fold-back labels may be an appropriate way for you to label small containers so that the label elements are legible. When tags are used, they must be affixed to the immediate container of the hazardouschemical in such a way that they do not become separated from the container.
As OSHA explained in a June 4, 2013, letter of interpretation, OSHA has developed a practical accommodation to address situations where the manufacturer can show that it is not feasible to use pull-out labels, fold-back labels, or tags containing the full HCS 2012 [ILPI:Original HCS 2012 context · Current HCS] required information for shipped small containers (i.e., the actual container holding the hazardouschemical). The June 4, 2013, letter is enclosed for your reference. This practical accommodation requires the manufacturer to include, at a minimum, the following information on the label of the immediate container:
[ILPI note: At issuance: HCS 2012. HCS 2024 codified small-container provisions in paragraph (f)(12), including separate conditions for 100 mL and 3 mL containers and the immediate outer package. Apply those provisions rather than this historical accommodation alone.]
The outside package must be clearly marked to ensure the complete label elements are visible and it must clearly inform users that the small container must be stored in the outer container bearing the complete label. The complete label must be maintained on the outer package (e.g., not torn, defaced, destroyed).
The manufacturer must ensure that any alternative labeling used does not conflict with any other standards. As such, the outside packaging must not present a hazard while the material is being stored.
The outside packaging is the container (e.g., bag, box) that the immediate product container is placed into, which may or may not be the exterior shipping container.
Example: Category 1 flammable liquid, named High Flam, where the only hazard is the flammability, manufactured by ABC.
Extremely flammable liquid and vapor, all the precautionary statements (e.g., Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep cool. Keep container tightly closed) see Appendix C, subsection C.4.19 [ILPI:Original HCS 2012 context · Current HCS] for the full list of precautionary statements that must be present for a category 1 flammable liquid.
ABC 100 Any Street, Any Town, MA 14569
Phone # (123) 456-7890.
NOTE: As this is a flammable liquid, the outer packaging MUST not be of a material that is flammable or combustible, 29 CFR 1910.106(d)(2)(i).
While you state that it may be cost prohibitive for USP to comply with the HCS 2012 [ILPI:Original HCS 2012 context · Current HCS] labeling requirements, all provisions of the final standard were deemed economically feasible prior to the promulgation of these requirements. Based on the information provided in your letter, USP is required to include all labeling information [ILPI:Original HCS 2012 context · Current HCS] on the small vials you produce.
The small container accommodation you propose is not acceptable because the label does not include the product identifier, precautionary statements, and the manufacturer's name and phone number. Additionally, referring chemical users to SDSs to obtain the missing labeling elements is not acceptable. Labels are intended to serve as an immediate visual notation of key hazard information, and requiring users to refer to the SDS to obtain hazard information undermines this purpose.
Finally, the December 1, 2015, deadline only applies to distributors. Under 29 CFR 1910.1200(c) [ILPI:Original HCS 2012 context · Current HCS], a distributor is defined as any business, other than a chemical manufacturer or importer, which supplies hazardouschemicals to other distributors or to employers. In contrast, businesses that "produce" chemicals (i.e., manufacture, process, formulate, blend, extract, generate, emit, or repackage chemicals for use or distribution) are considered "chemical manufacturers" under the HCS 2012 [ILPI:Original HCS 2012 context · Current HCS], and must comply with the HCS 2012 labeling requirements [ILPI:Original HCS 2012 context · Current HCS] by June 1, 2015. Although your background information describes USP as a distributor, because it repackages chemicals into reference standards vials, USP is a manufacturer under the HCS. USP must therefore comply with all the HCS 2012 labeling requirements by June 1, 2015, and the company must be listed as the chemical manufacturer on the SDS.
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this information helpful. OSHA's requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our letters of interpretation do not create new or additional requirements but rather explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. From time to time, letters are affected when the
Agency updates a standard, a legal decision impacts a standard, or changes in technology affect the interpretation. To assure that you are using the correct information and guidance, please consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Health Enforcement at (202) 693-2190.