| The Home page of ILPI's Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Resource, the leader in SDS information since 1995! | |
| The history and philosophy behind this resource. | |
| A curated collection of books and reference materials concerning Safety Data Sheets and closely related topics. | |
| Paste your plain text SDS into the SDS-Demystifier, and it will be converted into a hypertext-enriched document with links to detailed explanations of each key term. | |
| An extensive list of frequently asked questions about Safety Data Sheets including regulations, content, compliance, and more. | |
| A humorous take on Safety Data Sheet jargon. Fill in the blanks on our entry form to generate a personalized Unsafety Data Sheet to share with your coworkers. | |
| Since 1995, we've maintained this massive curated list of the best places to find Safety Data Sheets on the Internet. | |
| Way more than a glossary, this hypertext-enhanced resource covers hundreds of SDS-related terms and expert knowledge. Each entry includes both the SDS relevance and links to additional authoritative resources. | |
| Archived results of Safety Data Sheet related polls taken by some of our millions of site visitors | |
| You are here! The OSHA regulations behind SDS regulations, including the inspection guidelines and over 400 official interpretations letters under the Hazard Communication Standard | |
| Commercial suppliers of SDS authoring and management software as well as cloud compliance services. | |
| Commercial companies that will create SDS's for your specific needs as well as SDS translation companies. |
Safety signs, banners, and scoreboards? Get yours at Safety Emporium!
| Title: 11/19/2013 - List in SDS section 3 when the classification is based on mixture data | |
| Record Type: Interpretation | Standard Number: 1910.1200(d)(3)(i) |
| OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov. |
November 19, 2013
Mr. Scott Amoroso
IHS, Inc.
477 Rue Levy
St Laurent, QC H4R 2P9
Canada
Dear Mr. Amoroso:
Thank you for your July 7, 2013, email to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Your email was referred to OSHA's Directorate of Enforcement Programs for a response to your specific question regarding the requirement to list ingredients in Section 3 of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) under the revised Hazard Communication standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200 (HCS 2012). This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation only of the requirements herein, and may not be applicable to any questions not delineated within your original correspondence. Your paraphrased question and our response is below.
Scenario: A chemical manufacturer is classifying a product based on mixture test data, per 1910.1200(d)(3)(i). This data shows that although the product contains a sensitizer above the cut-off value, the mixture itself is not a sensitizer.
We have all kinds of glassware for filtering mixtures at Safety Emporium.
Question 1: For chemical mixtures classified based on whole mixture test data, do the ingredients need to be listed in Section 3 of the SDS?
Response: Yes, per 1910.1200(g)(2)(iii), all ingredients that are classified as health hazards and are present at or above their cut-off/concentration limit or present a health risk below the cut-off value/concentration limit must be listed in Section 3 of the SDS. See also 29 CFR 1910.1200, Appendix D, Safety Data Sheets, Table D.1, heading 3, for the specific content. The requirement to provide the ingredient information in Section 3 applies regardless of how the classification of the mixture is performed (i.e., whether classification is based on test data for the complete mixture, based on bridging principles, or based on cut-off values/concentration limits).
As you are aware, section A.0.4 in Appendix A, Health Hazard Criteria, of HCS 2012 provides the requirements for the classification of mixtures. Specifically, section A.0.4.1 includes the recommended order of precedence for classification. For most hazard classes, the recommended order of precedence is: (1) classification based on the test data for the complete mixture; (2) classification using bridging principles when test data are not available for the mixture itself; and (3) classification using the cut-off-values/concentration limits of the ingredients. For the hazards of Carcinogenicity, Germ Cell Mutagenicity and Reproductive Toxicity, however, mixtures must be classified based on the cut-off value/concentration limits of the mixture's ingredients, unless on a case-by-case basis, there is justification for classifying based on test data for the complete mixture.
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this information helpful. OSHA's requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our letters of interpretation do not create new or additional requirements but rather explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. From time to time, letters are affected when the Agency updates a standard, a legal decision impacts a standard, or changes in technology affect the interpretation. To assure that you are using the correct information and guidance, please consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Health Enforcement at (202) 693-2190.
Sincerely,
Thomas Galassi, Director
Directorate of Enforcement Programs
The original official public domain version of this document is available from OSHA at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2013-11-19.