On Jul 16, 2014, at 11:05 AM, "Roger McClellan" <roger.o.mcclellan**At_Symbol_Here**ATT.NET> wrote:
To all:Up till now, I have resisted responding to this string of e-mails. I was actually flabbergasted by the initial inquiry. However, in a private conversation with a colleague the response to me was I just did not understand how Universities worked and how low safety professionals typically were in the University hierarcy.I am responding today because we have additional front page headlines about how one of the world's alleged leading health institutions, the CDC , has failed to follow its own rules for handling dangerous biological agents and failed to adequately inspect other laboratories. As you all know, the world of chemical safety and biological safety are joined at the hip. In both arenas, there is a need for science based safety procedures. That requires rigorous analysis and development of codified rules for conduct to minimize the potential for any adverse impact on faculty, staff, students and the public.In my view, a "chemical waste storage" facility is exactly what is stated, it is a "chemical waste storage " facility. I find it difficult to comprehend how a faculty member , who should be providing leadership for creating a safe environment would even suggest the "chemical waste storage room" could also be used for "bike storage" . The reasons are clear as suggested by someone that the "chemical waste storage" room might contain corrosive vapors. If someone has a chemical waste storage facility in which it is obvious that corrosive vapors are present I hope it is evident to them they need to do a thorough analysis of the facility as to the adequacy of the operating procedures including ventilation. The analysis should have a cradle to grave orientation that considers all chemicals from the time of ordering to delivery to storage to use and on through to disposal. It is a linked system. The "chemical waste storage" room should be specific for the purpose not just a convenient empty room.However, the real bottom line message, out of what I view as a nonsensical exchange, is that a "safety culture" that engages personnel at all levels is needed to ensure the safety of all personnel. Teaching institutions have a special responsibility since they should be educating students as to best practices. It is unfortunate the Judge in the UCLA case did not impose penalties on officials of the University at all levels that contributed to a culture that accepted unsafe practices at UCLA. Everyone needs to learn from that case..In my opinion, an institution that has faculty who raise the question of whether a "chemical storage room " may also for convenience be used as a "bike storage" area does not have the appropriate "safety culture". for educating future generations.Best wishes to all who toil in the trenches to create and maintain safe work environments.Roger
Roger O. McClellan, DVM, MMS, DSc (Honorary)Diplomate - ABT and ABVT; Fellow- ATS, AAAR, SRA , HPS, and AAASMember - Institute of MedicineAdvisor, Toxicology and Risk Analysis
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 6:13 AM, Wayne Wood <wayne.wood**At_Symbol_Here**MCGILL.CA> wrote:
Good point, David. Many cyclists have switched over to carbon composite frames in order to have the option of storing their bikes in corrosives storage areas.Sorry, couldn't resist, vacation on the horizon. JW.Wayne Wood | Associate Director, University Safety (EHS), University Services - Directeur Adjoint, Direction de la pr=C3=A9vention (SSE), Services universitaires | McGill University | 3610 rue McTavish Street, 4th floor | Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1Y2 | Tel: (514) 398-2391I personally think that storing bikes in the chemmical storage area is not a good idea. That said, has anyone considered the long term damage to the bikes from chemical fumes in the storage area? From my experience, even stainless steel "corrodes" in a chemical storage area on long term exposure._________________________________________________________________________
David A. Katz
Chemist, Educator, Expert Demonstrator, Science Communicator, and Consultant
Programs and workshops for teachers, schools, museums, and the public
133 N. Desert Stream Dr. * Tucson, AZ 85745-2277 * USA
voice/fax: (520) 624-2207 * email: mailto:dakatz45**At_Symbol_Here**msn.com
Visit my web site: http://www.chymist.com
_________________________________________________________________________----- Original Message -----From: Timothy HauserSent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:46 AMSubject: Re: [DCHAS-L] chemicals and bikesPerhaps caging off the space if the storage facility you need for waste? Ventilation will flow thru chain link, security can be managed, you'll just need to make sure emergency responders and others can get access to the waste as necessary (i.e. bikes not blocking waste cage door access).TimTimothy M.. Hauser, CHMM, CCHO
Manager, Environmental, Health & SafetyPromega Corporation
2800 Woods Hollow Road, Madison WI 53711 USA
Timothy.Hauser**At_Symbol_Here**promega.com | Direct (608) 298-4807 | Cell: (262) 844-1665 | Fax: (608) 277-2677This electronic message contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the original.Leslie - It doesn't sound like you need much space; How about an aluminum storage building set up inside the storage area? Just a thought, since that could address the security issue and you should even be able to provide ventilation for the storage building if the logistics are right.RussRuss PhiferWC Environmental, LLC1085C Andrew DriveWest Chester, PA 19380Fax 800-858-6273Cell - 610-322-0657P Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail or any other documentFrom: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Leslie Coop
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Cal/OSHA Safety Sign-in Sheet RequirementThere is a room in an older science building that was originally designed for chemical storage; I am taking it over for our 180-day chemical waste accumulation area. Over the past few years it has been used for general storage (old chalkboards) and for faculty bike storage while they are on campus. The question is, can they continue to keep bikes in there along with the chemical waste.I have said it's not a good idea due to security (number of people with access) and training issues, as Debbie mentioned. Two of the faculty in on the discussion are from the chemistry department, so feel they should continue to be able to access the space. One of them recently had his bicycle stolen from the hallway outside his office, so secure bike storage is really a hot button for him right now. There are two bike racks just outside the building, but during the school year these are usually quite full. Most of the faculty offices aren't large enough to keep a bike in while working, and if they are in the hallways the fire exits get blocked. This is an issue all over campus, I'm just making it more difficult by taking away the science faculty's locked room. They asked for input from my professional organization, so Thanks!LeslieOn Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Debbie M. Decker <dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**ucdavis.edu> wrote:Yeah - we're a big bike campus, too. Working with the bike folks and the grounds folks, getting enough secure bike storage around the building helps a lot.To questions like that, I usually respond, "Must we?" and then start to make sure what they want to do won't compromise compliance or fire code or exiting or potentially damage the bike. I presume they want to store the bikes in the waste room because it's more secure than outdoors. If something goes wrong in the waste room, would they really want their bike in there? Can you maintain exiting? Can your hazardous waste haulers access what they need to access without tripping over bicycles? Are they properly trained to be in the waste room? They'll need to have at least awareness level training for hazardous waste operations and that has to be refreshed annually. You can make it painful and bureaucratic - that might work to discourage them.Hope this helps - just a few ideas off the top of my head.Best,DebbieDebbie M. Decker, CCHOSafety ManagerDepartment of ChemistryUniversity of California, Davis122 Chemistry1 Shields Ave.Davis, CA 95616Birkett's hypothesis: "Any chemical reactionthat proceeds smoothly under normal conditions,can proceed violently in the presence of an idiot."From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Leslie Coop
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 9:21 AM
To: mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDUSubject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Cal/OSHA Safety Sign-in Sheet RequirementFaculty want to know: Is is okay to store bicycles in the same room as with chemical waste?(They don't like my answer)Thanks!
P Please Consider the Environment before printing this Email
This email was sent from within the Reckitt Benckiser Group plc group of companies (http://www.reccol.com)This email (and any attachments or hyperlinks within it) may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are not entitled to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, disseminate or rely on this email in any way. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email and destroy it, and all copies of it.
We have taken steps to ensure that this email (and any attachments) are free from computer viruses and the like. However, it is the recipient's responsibility to ensure that it is actually virus free. Any emails that you send to us may be monitored for the purposes of ascertaining whether the communication complies with the law and our policies.
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post