From: psonnenfeld**At_Symbol_Here**EARTHLINK.NET
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] CA Prop 65 question
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 19:22:58 -0700
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 9936835.1407205378791.JavaMail.root**At_Symbol_Here**

Go to the state's Dept of Toxic Substances Control otherwise, review an MSDS prepared in the past five years for any product that has been sold in California. The language your are seeking should be in Section 15 or 16.


-----Original Message-----
>From: "George D.McCallion"
>Sent: Aug 4, 2014 6:30 PM
>Subject: [DCHAS-L] CA Prop 65 question
>Dear DCHAS Colleagues,
>I am pretty certain that Proposition 65 was discussed in one facet or another (in fact, the DCHAS Archives cites 09 Dec 2012 as the most recent posting). However I have a very specific question in regards to Proposition 65:
>I am looking for ‰??standard wording‰?? for a Proposition 65 warning statement on product labels.
>If anyone has feedback on this question it would be greatly appreciated.
>Thank you i advance.
>George D. McCallion
>124 Magnolia Court
>Collegeville, PA 19426
>Voice: 610.888.2436
>Email: medchem**At_Symbol_Here**

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.