From: ILPI Support <info**At_Symbol_Here**>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] CA Prop 65 question
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 22:48:05 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 4FD669F1-814A-4242-B163-4EC0869AED84**At_Symbol_Here**

A summary of the "clear and reasonable warnings" (safe harbor warnings) is available at

Rob Toreki

Safety Emporium - Lab & Safety Supplies featuring brand names
you know and trust.  Visit us at
esales**At_Symbol_Here**  or toll-free: (866) 326-5412
Fax: (856) 553-6154, PO Box 1003, Blackwood, NJ 08012

On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:30 PM, "George D.McCallion" <medchem**At_Symbol_Here**COMCAST.NET> wrote:

Dear DCHAS Colleagues,

I am pretty certain that Proposition 65 was discussed in one facet or another (in fact, the DCHAS Archives cites 09 Dec 2012 as the most recent posting). However I have a very specific question in regards to Proposition 65:

I am looking for "standard wording" for a Proposition 65 warning statement on product labels.

If anyone has feedback on this question it would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you i advance.


George D. McCallion
124 Magnolia Court
Collegeville, PA 19426

Voice: 610.888.2436
Email: medchem**At_Symbol_Here**

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.