Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2015 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2015 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google (12 articles)

Date: Jan 19, 2015 15:07 UTC

Author: Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Laboratory Spills

Date: Jan 20, 2015 13:01 UTC

Author: Kohler, Christopher E <cekohler**At_Symbol_Here**IU.EDU>

Subject context

From: Wawzyniecki Jr, Stefan <stefan.w**At_Symbol_Here**UCONN.EDU>

Subject: [DCHAS-L] N-100's for nanoparticle formulations.

Date: Jan 19, 2015 21:09 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

 

Much research is being conducted recently using nanoparticle formulations of chemotherapeutics as well as pain relief meds.  NIOSH and the Navy Public Health center have described the use of N 100’s as respiratory protection when working  with nanoparticles, and formulations.

 

My question is-

 

When evaluating animal research protocols involving formulations on the nanoscale such as chemotherapeutics, is anyone requiring N 100’s when the task isinjecting the medication, as opposed to actually formulating it?  One argument I hear from researchers is that their primary concern is autoinjection, which is why they have no problem with wearing gloves, but they would rather not  wear a respirator. 

 

Anyone involved in such risk assessment?

 

-Stefan Wawzyniecki, CIH, CHMM

University of Connecticut

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post