Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive


From: Charles Corey <charles.corey**At_Symbol_Here**BELL.NET>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] near-miss reporting form
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:12:22 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: BAY175-W45A95515FD64BBA46FA95B82CA0**At_Symbol_Here**phx.gbl
In-Reply-To <67518ED493A5794FB21A7CA33CD03C7A1B6EEC24**At_Symbol_Here**EX10MBOX03.pnnl.gov>


I would consider a chemical spill an " accident" =3B if the container fell on the floor=3B was picked up and placed back on the bench or in the fume hood and research or work continued , that I would consider an incident.

Charles =3B


Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:34:47 +0000
From: ms.alnajjar**At_Symbol_Here**PNNL.GOV
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] near-miss reporting form
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU

Combining the good definitions (modified) that have already been submitted, how about the set below:

 =3B

Definition of a near miss, unsafe working condition, or hazardous condition

Near miss - is an event or condition that has occurred, but did not result in personal injury or property damage because of intervening factors. =3B A chemical spills that does not result in a personal injury or property damage will be classified as a near miss. =3B

 =3B

Unsafe working condition - is a condition that is only slightly different from near miss in that the sequence of events =3Bthat would lead to a near miss has not yet been put into motion (e.g., unsafe employee work habits, use of malfunctioning equipment, improper use of PPE or lack off, etc.). =3B These would fall under safety observation reporting.

 =3B

Hazardous condition - is a condition, event, circumstance, or action of a person, which could lead to an injury or property damage.

 =3B

M

 =3B

 =3B

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Wilhelm, Monique
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 10:39 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] near-miss reporting form

 =3B

Hi Neal,

 =3B

This is a great question. =3B I was just discussing this with my colleagues last week. =3B Basically, it is left to the person reviewing a report (me) to determine if it is an incident versus a near miss in my dept.  =3BHowever, I want to capture more near misses. =3B We came up with the statement below, which may have been taken and edited from something found on the great www. =3B I would love some feedback from this group.

 =3B

all unplanned fires or other precursors to actual incidents, whether or not an injury or other damage occurred

 =3B

Thanks,

Monique Wilhelm

Laboratory Manager

Department of Chemistry &=3B Biochemistry

University of Michigan - Flint

 =3B

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of NEAL LANGERMAN
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 1:18 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] near-miss reporting form

 =3B

How about discussing how to define a Near Miss?
Sent from Neal Langerman's NEXUS 6.
Standard client confidentiality terms apply.

On Jan 12, 2016 09:10, "Debbie M. Decker" <=3Bdmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**ucdavis.edu>=3B wrote:

Hi:

 =3B

Seeking to not reinvent the wheel, does anyone have a near-miss reporting form they like? =3B I have one but I'm not happy with it.

 =3B

Thanks!

 =3B

Debbie

 =3B

Debbie M. Decker, CCHO, ACS Fellow

Immediate Past Chair, Division of Chemical Health and Safety

University of California, Davis

(530)754-7964

(530)304-6728

dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**ucdavis.edu

 =3B

Birkett's hypothesis: "Any chemical reaction

that proceeds smoothly under normal conditions,

can proceed violently in the presence of an idiot."

 =3B

 =3B

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post