From: Jeff Tenney <Jeff.Tenney**At_Symbol_Here**SDMYERS.COM>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Hydrogen
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 15:56:00 +0000
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: B08465628BB05D4E9F4CD5F74ACA8F1F5D7055D4**At_Symbol_Here**SDMMAIL2.sdmyers.net
In-Reply-To <1375074802.27370576.1462460545141.JavaMail.root**At_Symbol_Here**zimbra-mailbox>


I would agree if the remaining gas is Nitrogen.. Matheson Gas list the lower explosive limit of Hydrogen to be 4.0%. So a 5.5% Hydrogen with 64.5% Nitrogen and the remaining is 30% Oxygen then I would consider that flammable and explosive. Unless the 64.5% is a typo and is supposed to be 94.5 then I would agree you would have a nonflammable and nonexplosive mixture.  

 

Jeff

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Don Abramowitz
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 11:02 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Hydrogen

 

Martin,

Airgas sells a 5% Hydrogen/95% Nitrogen mixture and they characterize it as a non-flammable, compressed gas.  See http://www.airgas.com/msds/002119.pdf

          Don

Donald Abramowitz
Environmental Health & Safety Officer
Bryn Mawr College
101 N. Merion Avenue
Bryn Mawr, PA 19010-2899
(610) 526-5166

 


In light of the most recent incidents I would like to know if anyone considers a Hydrogen(0.1-5.5%)/Nitrogen(64.5-99%) mixture flammable? . 

 

 

Martin 

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List <dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu> on behalf of Eugene Ngai <eugene_ngai**At_Symbol_Here**COMCAST.NET>
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM
To: "DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU" <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Hydrogen

 

Hi!

 

My name is Eugene Ngai, Chemically Speaking LLC. I have spent over 40 years in the compressed gas industry and currently consult for many universities, national labs and private companies. I have done projects for some of you.

 

I was retained to help the UC Center of Laboratory Safety investigate the U of Hawaii incident.

 

They have forwarded me a number of questions regarding hydrogen. I would like to comment as follows

 

In the US there has been considerable work done on H2 safety, currently NFPA 55 Compressed Gases and Cryogenic Fluids Code  chapter 10 addresses gaseous systems and Chapter 11 liquid systems. We have been working closely with NFPA-2 which will be the new standard for H2 used as a fuel. Sandia National Labs is the lead research group on this. We are developing a test protocol to measure dispersion from a liquid vent stack so that we can accurately model it. Numerous meetings have been held to conduct a fault tree on siting a H2 fueling stations.

 

As to the Tsinghua incident, it is very difficult to get accurate information on an incident like this especially since it involves one of China's primer universities.. I am told  that the cylinder ruptured. Without seeing the cylinder it would be hard for me to speculate on what caused it.. I don't know if he was filling the cylinder. As you will note in my article "Dangerous Gas Mixtures Avoiding Cylinder Accidents" which is hyperlinked in the webpage. People fill cylinders all the time with gases that could compromise the cylinder. There have been many incidents involving fuel cell research.

 

http://www.chemicallyspeakingllc.com/

 

I had sent out an alert about this problem in 2011

http://www.chemicallyspeakingllc.com/home/our-company/files

 

A second possibility is hydrogen embrittlement. This typically occurs with high strength steels used for some cylinders. The Europeans suffered from hydrogen cylinder ruptures for many years. There is an ISO standard 11114-4 on how to test metals for H2 embrittlement. The typical US DOT 3AA and 3 A cylinders have a high enough alloy content to not become embrittled. Since it was H2 it was most likely to be filled in China. China has some very strict regulations under the GB standards on what cylinders can be used, but again not knowing the specifications or history of the cylinder I can only speculate.

 

Eugene

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.