From: NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] SDS missing ingredients
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:51:10 -0800
Reply-To: neal**At_Symbol_Here**chemical-safety.com
Message-ID: 026601d3acbe$20c5e440$6251acc0$**At_Symbol_Here**chemical-safety.com
In-Reply-To


Actually this is regulated under FIFRA, which over-rides all other labeling regs.

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Safety is the practice of fixed and unbendable principles, the first of which is to be flexible at all times. Paraphrase of Everett Dirksen.

The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

 

ACSafety has a new address:

NEAL LANGERMAN, Ph.D.

ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY, Inc.

PO Box 152329

SAN DIEGO CA 92195

011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)

www.chemical-safety.com

 

We no longer support FAX.

 

 Please contact me before sending any packages or courier delivery.  The address for those items is:

5340 Caminito Cachorro

San Diego CA 92105

 

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU] On Behalf Of Janice Umbaugh
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 7:42 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] SDS missing ingredients

 

I think this is a matter of "too many government agencies spoil the SDS." SDS and occupational hazard labeling content are generally the responsibility of OSHA. However, assuming that this cleaner is also a consumer product, then the labeling can be governed by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, which has no jurisdiction over SDS content. It might also be governed by the EPA for pesticides/biocides, which has limited jurisdiction over SDS content. Of course, all of these government agencies has different priorities and requirements, which just about guarantees that everything will be confusing.

 

At least you were able to get an SDS. If you're ever in the mood to waste a few weeks, try getting one for dishwashing detergent.

 

Janice Umbaugh

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU] On Behalf Of Hadden, Susan [JRDUS]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 9:55 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] SDS missing ingredients

 

While investigating an incident at my site recently, I came across an interesting issue. Interested in your thoughts.

 

The material involved is a commercially available spray disinfecting cleaner.

 

The container label listed these ingredients:

Active ingredients:

N-alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride, 0.1%

N-alkyl dimethyl ethyl benzyl ammonium chloride, 0.1%

Inert ingredients:  98%

 

I pulled the SDS to look for more exposure information. The SDS (updated June 2017) did not list those active ingredients but did list the propellants used and EDTA.  

This is what the SDS says:

 

Chemical Name                                                CAS number       %

Butane                                                                 106-97-8               1-5

Diethylene glycol monobutyl ether            112-34-5               1-5

Propane                                                               74-98-6                 1-5

EDTA                                                                     64-02-8                 1-5

 

Composition comments                US GHS: The exact percentage (concentration) of composition has been withheld as a trade secret in accordance with paragraph (i) of 1910.1200.

 

I took that statement to mean the exact percentage of the ingredients listed were withheld, not that there were other ingredients not listed. It says percentage, not components. Though if you do the math, clearly something is missing from this list.

 

I thought that rather odd so I called tech support of the manufacturer. At first, they were confused as well, then told me that because the active ingredients were EPA registered materials, they did not have to be listed on the SDS. My reaction: Say what???

 

I have seen SDS that said proprietary mixture but still gave you a clue. But I had no idea an SDS could give no indication that there were other ingredients. 

 

No one I have asked at my organization has ever heard of this.

 

Have any of you? 

 

Signed,

No longer trusting SDS (which I suppose I should know better than to anyway).

 

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.