Oct 6, 1994 - Labelling, training and material safety data sheet and the Hazard Communication standard.Oct 6, 1994 - Labelling, training and material safety data sheet…
The Home page of ILPI's Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Resource, the leader in SDS information since 1995!
The history and philosophy behind this resource.
A curated collection of books and reference materials concerning Safety Data Sheets and closely related topics.
Paste your plain text SDS into the SDS-Demystifier, and it will be converted into a hypertext-enriched document with links to detailed explanations of each key term.
An extensive list of frequently asked questions about Safety Data Sheets including regulations, content, compliance, and more.
A humorous take on Safety Data Sheet jargon. Fill in the blanks on our entry form to generate a personalized Unsafety Data Sheet to share with your coworkers.
Since 1995, we've maintained this massive curated list of the best places to find Safety Data Sheets on the Internet.
Way more than a glossary, this hypertext-enhanced resource covers hundreds of SDS-related terms and expert knowledge. Each entry includes both the SDS relevance and links to additional authoritative resources.
Archived results of Safety Data Sheet related polls taken by some of our millions of site visitors
You are here! The OSHA regulations behind SDS regulations, including the inspection guidelines and over 400 official interpretations letters under the Hazard Communication Standard
Commercial suppliers of SDS authoring and management software as well as cloud compliance services.
Commercial companies that will create SDS's for your specific needs as well as SDS translation companies.
Safety signs, banners, and scoreboards? Get yours at Safety Emporium!
OSHA Hazard Communication Letters of Interpretation
Labelling, training and material safety data sheet and the Hazard Communication standard.
ILPI assessment: Low exposure alone does not waive duties; old mixture/label citations need updating
This letter addresses the obsolete 1994 version of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS). Its main HazCom conclusion remains useful: nondetects, invisibility of dust or a low airborne level do not automatically eliminate chemical-information duties. A coating's mass must not be diluted by the whole fastener when evaluating what can be released.
Under the current HCS, apply complete article definition (FAQ), hazard classification and current mixture criteria rather than the old universal 0.1% shorthand. Merely claiming article status is insufficient. Independently apply current cadmium hazard communication and the other cadmium requirements to actual occupational exposure; an HCS article claim does not itself waive that separate standard. Installed-product identification is now (m)(3)(iv), not the old (iii). Current classification must address the cadmium-specific hazards required by (m)(1).
OSHA marks its matching original corrected 12/6/2024.
This comparison with current requirements is not a finding that OSHA has formally withdrawn this letter. This assessment reflects editorial judgment informed by human review and AI assistance. It is an opinion, may contain errors or omissions, and is not an official OSHA determination. For guidance on how OSHA requirements apply to your circumstances, contact your local OSHA office.
OSHA's notice about interpretation letters
The following notice is published on OSHA's interpretation pages; it is general guidance, not a letter-specific withdrawal notice.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
This is in response to your letters of July 28, 1993, and May 10, concerning the labelling, training and material safety data sheet (MSDS) requirements of the Cadmium standard, 29 CFR 1910.1027, and the Hazard Communication standard (HCS), 29 CFR 1910.1200 [ILPI:Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS], as each would apply to cadmium-coated or cadmium-plated fasteners. We apologize for the long delay in our response to your first letter.
In your first letter you inquired if labelling, MSDS or training would be required under the Cadmium standard or the HCS, where the potential source of exposure is cadmium coated fasteners. More specifically, you wanted to know how the particular provisions under either standard would apply to the following conditions, (1) airborne cadmium exposure is less than the limit of detection where the limit of detection is below 10% of the PEL and (2) where airborne cadmium exposure is detectable but less than the action level. You also asked if the standard would apply if cadmium dust was or was not visible in containers or on gloves or hands of employees.
In the May 10 letter, you made an additional inquiry related to the requirements of the cadmium standard. You asked if the requirements to label installed cadmium containing products apply to appliances such as washing machines or vehicles which contain metal parts joined with cadmium plated fasteners or with cadmium coated fasteners?
As you may know, the Cadmium standard applies to all occupational exposures to cadmium and cadmium compounds. Further, paragraph 1910.1027(m) specifies the requirement for communication of cadmium hazards to employees including referencing the Hazard Communication (HCS) standard [ILPI:Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS].
Under the HCS, employers are required to provide information to their employees about the hazardouschemicals which are known to be present in the workplace in such a manner that employees may be exposed under normal conditions of use or in a foreseeable emergency. Exposure is defined to include both possible and accidental exposure.
The HCS addresses chemical hazards which are inherent properties of the hazardous chemical and would exist no matter what quantity was present in the workplace. Risk is a function of the inherent hazard and level of exposure. A substance either is or is not a hazardous chemical; the HCS definition cannot be read to indicate that a substance could be a hazardouschemical in some concentrations but not in others.
"a manufactured item other than a fluid or particle; (i) which is formed to a specific shape or design during manufacture; (ii) which has end use function(s) dependent in whole or in part upon its shape or design during end use; and (iii) which under normal conditions of use does not release more than very small quantities, e.g., minute or trace amounts of a hazardous chemical (as determined under paragraph (d) of this section [ILPI:Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS]), and does not pose a physical hazard or health risk to employees."
You stated that the amount of cadmium is less than the 0.1% of the HCS's threshold level for mixtures not tested as a whole (refer to 1910.1200(d)(5)(iii) [ILPI:Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS; old procedure superseded by classification criteria]). OSHA does not believe that the mixture (0.1%) trigger level is relevant in this case. The mechanical coating or plating of cadmium to the fasteners does not combine to form a mixture. The cadmium adheres to the outer surface layer of the fastener. Consequently, the weight of cadmium coating in relation to the total weight of the fasteners is unrelated to what is released and available for employee exposure. However, the percentage of cadmium in the coating material alone would be relevant to the 0.1% trigger level and therefore, employee exposure.
You questioned whether the HCS applies when cadmium dust is visible in a container or on the worker. Application of the HCS is not based on whether the hazardouschemical is visible. It applies whenever cadmium is known to be present in the workplace. The absence or presence of visible cadmium dust would be important information in terms of personal protective equipment and hygiene practices.
In response to the questions contained in your second letter. Paragraph 1910.1027(m)(3)(iii) is a performance requirement that states: "Where feasible, installed cadmium products shall have a visible label or other indication that cadmium is present. Consequently, some form of identification, such as a label, would be required for the installed cadmium containing fasteners.
[ILPI note: The installed-product identification requirement is now 1910.1027(m)(3)(iv). Apply the current cadmium standard and modern HCS requirements together; the historical paragraph number has changed.]
Should you require additional information please feel free to contact the Office of Health Compliance Assistance at (202) 219-8036.
Thank you for your inquiry regarding compliance with the Cadmium standard.
Sincerely,
John B. Miles, Jr., Director Directorate of Compliance Programs