Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated


The Home page of ILPI's Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Resource, the leader in SDS information since 1995!
The history and philosophy behind this resource.
A curated collection of books and reference materials concerning Safety Data Sheets and closely related topics.
Paste your plain text SDS into the SDS-Demystifier, and it will be converted into a hypertext-enriched document with links to detailed explanations of each key term.
An extensive list of frequently asked questions about Safety Data Sheets including regulations, content, compliance, and more.
A humorous take on Safety Data Sheet jargon. Fill in the blanks on our entry form to generate a personalized Unsafety Data Sheet to share with your coworkers.
Since 1995, we've maintained this massive curated list of the best places to find Safety Data Sheets on the Internet.
Way more than a glossary, this hypertext-enhanced resource covers hundreds of SDS-related terms and expert knowledge. Each entry includes both the SDS relevance and links to additional authoritative resources.
Archived results of Safety Data Sheet related polls taken by some of our millions of site visitors
You are here! The OSHA regulations behind SDS regulations, including the inspection guidelines and over 400 official interpretations letters under the Hazard Communication Standard
Commercial suppliers of SDS authoring and management software as well as cloud compliance services.
Commercial companies that will create SDS's for your specific needs as well as SDS translation companies.
Safety Emporium has thousands of OSHA safety signs and more

Safety signs, banners, and scoreboards? Get yours at Safety Emporium!

OSHA Hazard Communication Letters of Interpretation

Employee exposure to consumer products.

Issued
Record type
Interpretation
Historical standard
1910.1200, 1987 expanded rule (PDF)
Current standard
HCS 2024, as amended

ILPI assessment: Actual use governs the exemption; modern label exemptions are separate

This letter addresses the obsolete 1987 version of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS). Its central HazCom conclusion remains consistent: workplace consumer-product exposure can fall outside the full exemption when actual purpose, duration or frequency does not meet its conditions. A consumer brand or package alone is not enough.

Use the complete current consumer-product exemption (FAQ explanation) and distinguish the separate CPSC-related labeling exemption from full relief. The letter's broad jurisdiction discussion does not mean all occupational use of consumer products is outside OSHA. See the consumer-product FAQ. Historical court dates, named contacts and implementation details should not be used as present instructions. The original historical directive is original CPL 2-2.38C (October 22, 1990). Current enforcement counterpart: current HCS inspection procedures.

Last reviewed: .

Related interpretations
About this ILPI assessment

This comparison with current requirements is not a finding that OSHA has formally withdrawn this letter. This assessment reflects editorial judgment informed by human review and AI assistance. It is an opinion, may contain errors or omissions, and is not an official OSHA determination. For guidance on how OSHA requirements apply to your circumstances, contact your local OSHA office.

OSHA's notice about interpretation letters

The following notice is published on OSHA's interpretation pages; it is general guidance, not a letter-specific withdrawal notice.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

Source: OSHA's original letter page.

November 27, 1990 Mr. Dan J. Helm
Compliance Software/Haz-I-Dent
1721 Stuart Court
Duluth, Minnesota 55803

Dear Mr. Helm:

Boxes of N95 respirators

Get your PPE such as made in USA NIOSH-approved N95 masks from Safety Emporium.

Thank you for your letter, received in this office October 2, regarding employee exposure to consumer products under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), 29 CFR 1910.1200 [ILPI: Original HCS 1987 context (PDF) · Current HCS].

You specifically requested "written documentation ... regarding commercial use of consumer products." On October 22, the newly revised Hazard Communication compliance directive, OSHA Instruction CPL 2-2.38C, was issued. This directive, entitled "Inspection Procedures for the Hazard Communication Standard," contains compliance guidelines, clarifications and interpretations on all provisions of the standard, including the Agency's enforcement policies regarding workplace use of consumer products.

A copy of CPL 2-2.38C is enclosed for your information and reference on this and other hazard communication related issues. Please note that this OSHA Instruction is not a "rule", per se, as you refer to in your letter. OSHA Instructions provide interpretative guidance and Agency enforcement policies which are particularly relevant and helpful for this "performance oriented" standard.

Occupational exposure to consumer products is covered under the HCS when the employee's use results in exposures to the chemical that are more frequent or of a longer duration than would be expected from normal consumer use (see narrative discussion on this issue in Appendix of A, CPL 2-2.38C ILPI note: Original: CPL 2-2.38C (1990). Current counterpart: consumer-products guidance., page 5). In addition, pages 3-4 of the Instruction contain information regarding the Supreme Court decision of February 21 of this year, the effect of which is full enforcement of the HCS with regard to the three previously stayed provisions of the standard, including the applicability of the rule to consumer products used in the workplace (see section H., "Background").

[ILPI note: At issuance: 1910.1200, 1987 expanded rule (PDF). Current counterpart: consumer-product exemption (FAQ explanation). Actual intended purpose, duration and frequency matter. Distinguish the separate labeling exemption from a full HazCom exemption.]

You posed a second question to the Agency: "Would it be a better standard (better for employees, easier for employers to understand, easier to enforce and clearer), to apply the Hazard Communication Standard to all chemicals used by employees?" OSHA and the Department of Labor are precluded under Section 4(b)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) from exercising "statutory authority to prescribe or enforce standards or regulations'' over areas or issues that other Federal agencies already "prescribe or enforce." The Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.) and the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (15 U.S.C. 1261 et seq.) regulate the use of consumer products and/or hazardous substances outside the workplace. The labeling, therefore, of consumer products is under the Consumer Product Safety Commission's authority, while the requirement to provide MSDSs and train employees in their safe handling in the workplace falls under OSHA's jurisdiction if, again, their use is of a greater frequency or duration (and therefore a greater exposure risk) than what a normal consumer would experience.

We hope this discussion and enclosed material will be helpful to you. For your future reference, you may want to contact our Chicago Regional Office at (312) 353-2220 with any further questions on Hazard Communication. Each OSHA Regional Office has a Hazard Communication Coordinator, and, in Chicago, that person is Ms. Ann Williams. She would be happy to help you with any further questions you may have. The Chicago Regional Office's address is:

U.S. Department of Labor - OSHA
32nd Floor, Room 3244
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Sincerely,

Patricia K. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs


The original official public domain version of this document is available from OSHA at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1990-11-27.