Aug 31, 1994 - Review and comment on generic labels and consumer information sheets for chromated copper arsenate (CCA) pressure-treated lumber.Aug 31, 1994 - Review and comment on generic labels and consumer…
The Home page of ILPI's Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Resource, the leader in SDS information since 1995!
The history and philosophy behind this resource.
A curated collection of books and reference materials concerning Safety Data Sheets and closely related topics.
Paste your plain text SDS into the SDS-Demystifier, and it will be converted into a hypertext-enriched document with links to detailed explanations of each key term.
An extensive list of frequently asked questions about Safety Data Sheets including regulations, content, compliance, and more.
A humorous take on Safety Data Sheet jargon. Fill in the blanks on our entry form to generate a personalized Unsafety Data Sheet to share with your coworkers.
Since 1995, we've maintained this massive curated list of the best places to find Safety Data Sheets on the Internet.
Way more than a glossary, this hypertext-enhanced resource covers hundreds of SDS-related terms and expert knowledge. Each entry includes both the SDS relevance and links to additional authoritative resources.
Archived results of Safety Data Sheet related polls taken by some of our millions of site visitors
You are here! The OSHA regulations behind SDS regulations, including the inspection guidelines and over 400 official interpretations letters under the Hazard Communication Standard
Commercial suppliers of SDS authoring and management software as well as cloud compliance services.
Commercial companies that will create SDS's for your specific needs as well as SDS translation companies.
Safety signs, banners, and scoreboards? Get yours at Safety Emporium!
OSHA Hazard Communication Letters of Interpretation
Review and comment on generic labels and consumer information sheets for chromated copper arsenate (CCA) pressure-treated lumber.
ILPI assessment: No OSHA approval implied; current hazards and EPA use restrictions also matter
This letter addresses the obsolete 1994 version of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS). Its main HazCom conclusions remain useful: OSHA does not preapprove labels, and a consumer information sheet does not replace the supplier's required SDS or complete hazard evaluation.
OSHA marks its source “Reviewed; consistent with current policy” dated February 14, 2008. That dated review is not a new approval of a current product or label.
This comparison with current requirements is not a finding that OSHA has formally withdrawn this letter. This assessment reflects editorial judgment informed by human review and AI assistance. It is an opinion, may contain errors or omissions, and is not an official OSHA determination. For guidance on how OSHA requirements apply to your circumstances, contact your local OSHA office.
OSHA's notice about interpretation letters
The following notice is published on OSHA's interpretation pages; it is general guidance, not a letter-specific withdrawal notice.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
The HCS does not require manufacturers to obtain prior OSHA approval of their product labeling. Likewise, it is not the responsibility of OSHA to evaluate the consumer information sheet for CCA pressure-treated wood. Further, OSHA's evaluation of the proposed label for CCA pressure-treated wood would compromise the responsibility of the manufacturer to complete all hazard determinations for this product. Under the HCS, the manufacturers of CCA pressure-treated lumber are responsible for chemical hazard information (Material Safety Data Sheets, labels, etc.) to be transmitted to downstream employers.
In our conversations, it is OSHA's understanding that the hazard evaluation for CCA pressure-treated lumber has not been completed. Therefore, the proposed label for CCA pressure-treated wood may not provide employees with the appropriate hazard warning information. For example, any chemical additives present in the wood which represent a health hazard must be included on the MSDSs and/or label as appropriate.
Additionally, the consumer information sheet is not required by the HCS. For clarification, the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) provides that owners or operators of facilities must submit information in the form of material safety data sheets (MSDSs), as required by the Occupational Safety and Health Act, or emergency and hazardouschemical forms about the hazardous substance at their facilities to the local emergency planning committee, the state emergency response commission, and the local fire department. In turn, this information may be restructured into information/fact sheets for interested community residents.
Further, EPCRA requires facility to government reporting, with annual inventory updates. The statute does not mandate facility to consumer reporting. On a federal level, consumer information sheets cannot substitute for the emergency and hazardouschemical forms, nor can they be used by the manufacturer to substitute for an MSDS under 29 CFR 1910.1200 [ILPI:Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS].