|
| MSDS Topics |
Free Sites | FAQ's | Regulations | Glossary | Software | Suppliers |
| Books | Forum | Poll | Fun stuff | Quiz | Store | |
| Advertising slots available. Contact us! | Search ALL our MSDS info | |||||
![]() |
| The MSDS FAQ: Compliance |


If the copies you received are exact duplicates (and not updated ones) of sheets that you already have in your "readily accessible" MSDS collection, then there is no requirement to keep the extra copies on hand. However, be sure to carefully check the revision dates on your sheets to make sure there haven't been any changes/updates that you might otherwise overlook! And should you receive an updated sheet, then be sure to read the question, "Can I throw away old or outdated MSDS's?" for information on what to do with the old sheet.
When you get the same chemical with the same formulation from several different manufacturers the situation is a little more complex. See the next question below for more information.

Obviously, there is no harm in keeping an MSDS from each manufacturer, and it probably takes less effort to do so than meeting all of the above conditions. Further, it may also be in your best legal interest to maintain documentation from each supplier/source, particularly for your employee exposure records or in the event one had to, for example, sue the manufacturer(s) of the material at some future date.
Also see the previous question in this FAQ.

In some cases, MSDS's may be a part of your OSHA-mandated "employee exposure records" and you would have to retain these for at least 30 years. While this is a remote possibility, it is something to think about from a legal liability standpoint. See OSHA's policy interpretation titled "Retention requirements for superseded MSDSs" for more information. Also see our FAQ entry What are my rights to an MSDS?
A common question is "Where can I find an old (10, 20, 35 years!) MSDS sheet?" Other than our answer in the next question, we do not have a good answer. If someone knows of a good source, let us know!

Under the OSHA HazCom standard, manufacturing employers were not legally required to obtain, maintain, and make available upon request copies of MSDS's until May 26, 1986; see this official OSHA interpretation "MSDSs for chemicals purchased prior to 1985".
Of course, a reasonable question is "what are you doing with a 20+ year old chemical?" Use it up, recycle it or properly dispose of it! If the chemical is so vital that you can't dispose of it and the solutions below don't help, consider having an MSDS supplier author one for you.
Also see the next question for more info.

As far as the impact this has on an workplace where these obsolete chemicals are still in use goes, we have been hard-pressed to find an actual OSHA interpretation. Our best guess is that they would require you to make a documented "good faith" effort to locate a sheet, starting with the manufacturer (see OSHA Field Inspection Reference Manual CPL 2.103, Section 8 - "Chapter IV. Post-Inspection Procedures" for more about good faith).
If you are not using an MSDS software package or MSDS supplier who can assist you, start by figuring out what happened to the company. While many companies go bankrupt, their assets and product lines are usually acquired by other manufacturers. Try a web search on the company name. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission keeps records of publicly-traded companies, mergers and acquisitions, so you might try there as well.
If all else fails, see if you can find an MSDS for an identical formulation from another manufacturer (see "Do I have to keep every MSDS that I receive?" above and OSHA comments on generic MSDS's in the previous section). As long as you've made efforts such as these and you don't have any willful violations of any type you are probably (this is our best guess) looking at a "de minimus" violation, i.e. one where OSHA might note it during an inspection but not assess a penalty.

See the following interpretations for more information:

For over-the-counter retail or wholesale sales to employers (but not consumers), paragraph (g)(7) of the HazCom Standard requires the seller to provide the MSDS upon request and to post a sign that an MSDS is available. If a retailer does not have commercial accounts and does not use the material, then they are ony required to provide an employer with the contact information for the distributor, manufacturer or importer who can supply the sheet.
Some chemical suppliers ship MSDS's with every shipment, others hold to the minimum standard. The latter practice can be a real pain at a large organization where it may be the first time you ordered that chemical, but it's not the first time your employer (i.e. the purchaser) did.
Fortunately, most manufacturers are happy to provide additional copies of an MSDS if you simply contact their customer service department and ask. In fact, many of them have realized the benefit of making all their MSDS's freely available on the Internet.
To help ensure that your suppliers comply with OSHA requirements, it can't hurt to add the following sort of statement to your purchase orders:
Another good idea for over-the-counter purchases is to require your employees to provide not only receipts for their purchases, but MSDS's.

According to OSHA 1910.1200 (f)(11), a new MSDS must be issued within three months if any of these conditions are met.. As described elsewhere in this FAQ, the old MSDS should be retained to potentially limit future liability.
Recognize that this update requirement does not require the manufacturer to send a new MSDS to you if you purchased a chemical prior to the MSDS update. In other words, your MSDS's will go out of date from time to time. It is a good idea to review your collection on a set basis and to update your sheets. What time frame to use is up to you. The NTP updates its annual report on carcinogens each year, but perhaps longer is more appropriate depending on the nature of the materials and your business. You should consider setting a corporate policy on the matter. Alternatively, you can subscribe to an MSDS software vendor or MSDS supplier so you always have up-to-date sheets.
Those of you in Great Britain (and presumably the rest of the European Union) will be pleased to hear that CHIP requires the supplier to notify anyone who received the material in the previous 12 months if there is a change in the MSDS. See the European entry in the International section of this FAQ for more information.
In some countries, MSDS's have expiration dates. See the International Section of this FAQ for Canadian and European regulations.

For more on this (and from a manufacturer's perspective as well) the official OSHA interpretation titled "12/30/1997 - Manufacturer and employer responsibilities when providing MSDSs electronically".
The most popular types of electronic format include CD-ROM subscriptions (renewable on a quarterly or annual basis), fax on demand services (that will fax you a copy as soon as you request one), internet-based suppliers, and "in-house" solutions where corporations scan their MSDS sheets into a database rather than use a paper filing system.
Again, paperless compliance works only if the employees have "ready access" . If your database is accessible to the required employees on your corporate intranet, you'll probably be OK. This assumes that you have a written contingency plan to access MSDS information in the event of a power failure or other emergency. Such a plan might include keeping copies on file or using a battery-powered laptop computer. For on-line MSDS subscriptions, OSHA will permit you to use a telephone as a backup system (but not as a primary system) instead of requiring you to have printed copies.
See the next question and these two OSHA interpretations which discuss paperless compliance and "barriers" to access:

What constitutes "barriers"? For example, if your corporation owns an MSDS CD-ROM but it is kept in a locked filing cabinet in the branch office in darkest Peru, OSHA will not consider you to be in compliance. Quoting OSHA again:

Improper compliance with the Hazard Communication Standard (which includes MSDS's) is the most frequently cited violation in the manufacturing, transport, wholesale, retail and services industries, and it is in the top five in all other categories. Acccording to 1999 OSHA statistics, there were 3,642 inspections that reported violations of 1910.1200, resulting in 7,122 citations and fines totalling $1,563,556.81. That's an average fine of $219 per citation or $429 per inspection, although some of these citations carried no fine.
Note: In 2010, OSHA announced that the maximum fine for a serious violation capable of causing death would rise to $12,000 and the maximum penalty for a "willful" or knowing violation will rise to $250,000. In addition, OSHA announced a Severe Violator Enforcement Program which targets firms that have demonstrated indifference to their OSH Act obligations by willful, repeated, or failure-to-abate violations.

While your method of managing your MSDS collection is flexible, specific criteria you need to meet are:

The HazCom standard is performance-based meaning that OSHA does not care how the employers share this information as long the employees have no barriers to accessing the information when they need it and the plan for sharing this information in writing. The simplest solution for the multi-employer workplace is to provide each other copies of the MSDS's or to add your MSDS's to their collection (as long as your employees have access). Of course, other training, labeling etc. may be required; MSDS's are only a part of the HazCom standard.

For an electronic system using an MSDS software program or on-line service, organization is not really an issue as employees can call up MSDS's using various criteria such as chemical name, CAS Number, or chemical formula.
But for those of you who simply file paper copies, how to order your filing cabinet or 3-ring binder is a more difficult question. Again, OSHA doesn't care how you choose to do it, but employees have to be able to find the information when they need it. For this reason, many people prefer to file their MSDS's alphabetically by name. The biggest drawback to this is that one person might call a particular chemical "acetone" and another might call it "2-propanone". Both are synonyms for the same chemical compound. Here's a solution. First, file by the name on the MSDS because it should be identical to the name on the container. Second, for each chemical synonym listed on the MSDS, make a page with that name as the title and write a note on it such as "see the MSDS for acetone".
|
Another popular method in chemical laboratories is to file MSDS' by molecular or chemical formula. The standard convention is to list carbon and hydrogen first, followed by the other chemical elements in alphabetical order. If there is no carbon in the compound, then simple alphabetical order is used. For example, potassium carbonate, K2CO3, would be listed as CK2O3 and magnesium sulfate, MgSO4, would be listed as MgO4S. The drawbacks here are that not all materials have chemical formulas (such as cleaning agents), and this system is more difficult for non-chemists. We suggest that you take a look and/or search our MSDS Forum because this question has been asked many times before. Feel free to start a new discussion with your thoughts and comments. |
Get your preprinted MSDS binders from our on-line store, SafetyEmporium.com. |

The one recommendation we will make is that you maintain your paper copies. Beyond that, we'll also say that some organizations will find it very advantageous to utilize one of the "paperless compliance" services discussed in this document. But that's where our specific recommendations end, sorry.

At the very least you can use the free sites on the Internet to make hard copies of MSDS's that you need for your collection or to see if more recent sheets are available.


MSDS's are part of the hazard communication process and training requirements; if your employees do not understand English and you do not provide training in a language they comprehend then you are not in compliance. See this 1988 OSHA interpretation titled "The employer must provide the 1910.1200 verbal training in a language that is comprehensible".
On April 28, 2010, OSHA issued an OSHA Training Standards Policy Statement that affirms the training requirement be understood in the employee's language: http://www.osha.gov/dep/standards-policy-statement-memo-04-28-10.html. This Statement includes the following:
See the International section of this FAQ for information on finding non-English sheets.


However, OSHA directive CPL 2-2.38D - Inspection Procedures for the Hazard Communication Standard, says in part (paragraph g, section 1d):
The following procedures apply in situations where the employer's MSDS/label is inadequate or deficient and the employer relied upon the information supplied by the chemical manufacturer or importer:
In other words, you won't receive an OSHA fine or citation in the circumstance OSHA describes, but that doesn't mean you won't get hit with a lawsuit. You'll need to contact an attorney who specializes in product liability for a complete answer to your question.
Note that if you do become aware of a hazard/precaution that is missing from an MSDS, then you need to make your employees aware of the new hazard/precaution in writing. You should also make an effort to notify the manufacturer. See the OSHA interpretation, "Requirements of the HCS and the employer's ability to rely on a manufacturer's hazard determination" for futher information.
See also "Where does one submit MSDS's for official approval? and Does OSHA determine what information is required under health hazard information or can we use our own data? elsewhere in this FAQ.

If you need MSDS binders, MSDS CD-ROM's, training posters, Hazard Communication labels and more, check out our on-line store, SafetyEmporium.com.

If you need MSDS binders, MSDS CD-ROM's, training posters, Hazard Communication labels and more, check out our on-line store, SafetyEmporium.com.

[Previous (Content)] [Top of Page] [Next (International)]

Notice: This page is copyright 1998-2013 by ILPI and was last updated Monday, December 17, 2012. Unauthorized duplication or posting on other web sites is expressly prohibited. Disclaimer: The information contained herein is believed to be true and accurate, however ILPI makes no guarantees concerning the veracity of any statement. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. ILPI strongly encourages the reader to consult the appropriate local, state and federal agencies concerning the matters discussed herein.